🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive move to ban social networking access for those under 16 is creating waves internationally. Officials, child protection groups, and families are watching with great interest to see if this strategy will set a precedent for other nations.

European Movement

Throughout Europe, a rising group of nations are considering parallel measures.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister stating that phones and platforms are "stealing our children's childhood". Legislation may be enacted next year.
• Norway is planning to implement a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to protect young people from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to authenticate the user details of social media users. The media minister have suggested that an Australia-style ban is "an measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has called on the legislature to pass a bill increasing the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a related action, including an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Netherlands has urged families to restrict their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a symbolic statement demanding a ban for under-16s except if parental consent is provided. While it highlights of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the step does not create binding law.

"An effective age limit is a solid foundation," said the European lawmaker driving the initiative.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Stance

In the UK, the administration has kept open a future ban, arguing that "nothing is being dismissed" but stressing any action must be "based on robust research".

Earlier, momentum gathered behind a bill to enact controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately watered down. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to investigate the topic.

Campaign organizations have raised warnings. A prominent charity set up by the relatives of a teenager who died after being exposed to harmful online content contends that a blanket age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could create a "cliff edge" of exposure when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the Silicon Valley to build products and services that are appropriate and age appropriate for young users," said a leading peer.

America: A Decentralized Picture

Stateside, action is largely occurring at the regional level amid national gridlock.

• Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a law barring children under fourteen from joining social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has passed a regulation restricting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with extra time requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted laws mandating parental consent for under-16s to create social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from certain individuals to follow the Australian lead, a federal ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Global Views

Beyond these regions, additional states are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the access age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, world bodies take a more nuanced position. The UN children's agency has advised that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could prove counterproductive". The body points out that social networks can be a "vital connection" for marginalized youth and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to improve user protection.

As this international conversation unfolds, the actions of the Australian government and its followers indicate that policymakers internationally are increasingly willing to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.